California’s High-Speed Rail Goes Off Track

Virginia Postrel, in Bloomberg View, writes that a major high-speed rail project between Los Angeles and San Francisco is far behind schedule and dramatically over budget.

Postrel notes that the project’s original estimated cost has ballooned from $33 billion to $68 billion, and government leaders created unrealistic expectations about the rail’s cost and benefits to gain public support. As she writes:

“the high-speed rail project is a classic example of how concentrated benefits and diffused costs shape public policy, even when the general public has a direct say.”

Estimated ticket prices have also increased 60 percent, and the state’s subsidy from the cap-and-trade auction has not delivered projected revenues needed to fully fund the project.

As Postrel reports, “When the Spanish construction company Ferrovial submitted its winning bid for a 22-mile segment, the proposal included a clear and inconvenient warning: ‘More than likely, the California high speed rail will require large government subsidies for years to come.’”

However, Postrel further notes that the Los Angeles Times discovered that the same subsidy warnings were absent from public postings of the bid.

More Blog Posts

04-16-2019 11:37am

New Survey Reveals American Consumers Support Businesses Hiring Those with Criminal Records

New research from SHRM and the Charles Koch Institute found that the vast majority of American consumers support purchasing goods and services from businesses that employ people with non-violent criminal records.

Read more

04-04-2019 03:05pm

On 70th Anniversary of NATO, Key Member States Question Its Relevancy and Efficacy

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) celebrates its 70th anniversary, and in advance of this historical commemoration, a new survey asked respondents in key NATO member states about NATO’s effectiveness and relevance in today’s world.

Read more

04-01-2019 05:29pm

Protecting Protest: How Proposed Rules Would Chill Free Expression Around DC Landmarks

Given the timeless importance of protecting civil liberties, the Charles Koch Institute today joins the ACLU in voicing concern about a proposed National Park Service (NPS) rule that could hinder free speech and peaceful assembly around DC landmarks.

Read more

Sign up for updates