Columbia University Students Will Read Toni Morrison This Fall, But Not Trigger Warnings

Columbia University has decided not to implement a policy requiring the use of trigger warnings in class syllabi, following a heated debate on whether the practice curbs academic freedom.

Trigger warnings, or labels on a work of literature designed to inform students that what they are about to read may incite PTSD, have become increasingly popular in recent years. Classic literary texts such as J.M. Coetzee’s “Disgrace” (“Trigger Warning: This book contains scenes of colonialism”) and even “The Great Gatsby” (“A variety of scenes that reference gory, abusive, and misogynistic violence”) have been subjected to the labeling process at universities. Advocates of trigger warnings argue that their inclusion in course syllabi prevent undue harm and anxiety on students who have experienced trauma.

In April, members of the student-led Multicultural Affairs Advisory Board published an op-ed in Columbia’s student newspaper, criticizing the inclusion of a classic Latin narrative poem, Ovid’s “Metamorphoses,” in Literature Humanities courses without also including a trigger warning for its depictions of assault. Following a routine review, the syllabus for the Literature Humanities was updated in June, and while “Metamorphoses” is no longer assigned, other texts, including Toni Morrison’s “Song of Solomon,” now appear on the reading list. But in its update, Columbia did not eliminate triggering texts or mandate the use of trigger warnings.

Roosevelt Montás, the director of Columbia’s Center for the Core Curriculum, explained that the inability to predict classroom discussions and a dedication to academic freedom negate the premise of trigger warnings in the classroom. “I don’t see any way that you can deal with the history of thought and politics and literature that we deal with without those issues being salient,” Montás said. “We are very zealous of guarding academic freedom and intellectual freedom of expression of professors […] so we are very careful not to appear to be acting in a role of thought police.”

The call for trigger warnings by students at Columbia fueled an ongoing debate over the practice. In an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal, Peggy Noonan responded to the objection to “Metamorphoses,” contending that “masterpieces, by their nature, pierce. They jar and unsettle. If something in a literary masterpiece upsets you, should the masterpiece really be banished?”

A recent online, nonscientific study of College Art Association and Modern Language Association members found 85 percent of respondents have not had students ask for the use of trigger warnings, with 63 percent responding that trigger warnings would have a negative impact on academic freedom.

More Blog Posts

06-11-2018 03:06pm

North Korea—Rational Actor, or Unbalanced Risk-Taker?

Could history made in the spring continue through the summer? After tense missile tests and discussions of “bloody nose” strikes, the Korean peninsula has been experiencing a period of unprecedented diplomacy.

Read more

Survey on North Korea: Americans, South Koreans Want Diplomacy Rather Than Military Engagement

In a new survey by the Charles Koch Institute and Real Clear Politics, Americans and South Koreans overwhelmingly agreed that they do not want to pursue military action against North Korea, whether or not the June 12 summit is successful in securing denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

Read more

05-17-2018 11:05am

An Untapped Talent Pool: SHRM and the Charles Koch Institute’s Survey on Employing Individuals With Criminal Records

To learn more about what drives hiring decisions involving people with a criminal record, the Charles Koch Institute and the Society for Human Resource Management have conducted a groundbreaking survey of employers and the American workforce.

Read more

Sign up for updates

Sign up to receive weekly updates in news and events.