Free Speech Protections Extend to Private Boycotts

The Los Angeles Times editorial board writes about the increasing presence of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement in the United States,  a controversial effort to boycott the nation of Israel until it ends its involvement in Palestine. Some BDS supporters accept the possibility of a “two-state solution,” but others do not.

In response to the BDS movement, which is increasingly criticized as a platform for anti-Semitism, some state governments are passing laws refusing to make contracts with any business engaged in a boycott of Israel.

The LA Times argues that such laws are both unnecessary and troubling attempts to stifle political speech. Moreover, it is not government’s role of to censure a person or a company, or to deny them access to a benefit or contract for which they otherwise would be eligible, simply because that person or company holds the “wrong” opinion on an issue.

When government uses the force of law to denote which side of a heated debate is the “correct” one, it ends the public discourse on that issue and stifles the speech of those who hold the “wrong” ideas. This further entrenches the “wrong” ideas in the minds of those who hold them and suppresses the important public dialogue that might eventually change people’s current views.

Conversely, those who would engage in a boycott should also consider how that decision comports with the purpose of their organizations. If, as in the case of universities, one of their organization’s goals is an open exchange of ideas, endorsing particular sides in a dispute can hamper a vibrant discussion on campus.

More Blog Posts

05-20-2020 01:20pm

StoryCorps Connect During COVID-19: Finding a New Way to Share America’s Stories

StoryCorps pivots to digital to keep building connections between people during the pandemic.

Read more

05-19-2020 05:39pm

Free speech provides comfort during COVID-19 pandemic

Trying circumstances can also present opportunities for people to come together. When people feel as if they face a common challenge, differences and divisions begin to blur. That’s cause for optimism.

Read more

05-14-2020 11:20am

Five steps for public officials to protect public health, regain public trust, and ensure civil liberties during COVID-19 crisis

Americans and their public officials grapple with the dynamic while working to protect public health and maintain the public confidence necessary for successful adoptions of temporary measures and ultimately restoration of their full civil liberties. Charles Koch Institute Senior Fellow Casey Mattox offers advice on the subject.

Read more

Sign up for updates