The NFL’s Welfare: Billions in Stadium Subsidies

Tonight the 2015 NFL season will kick off as the New England Patriots host their conference rival the Pittsburgh Steelers at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Massachusetts. Win or lose, Patriots’ fans will have bragging rights beyond being the reigning Super Bowl champions: While Gillette Stadium accepted $72 million in public funding for construction, or 17 percent of the project’s total cost, Heinz Field, the Steelers’ home, cost taxpayers $171.6 million, or 61 percent of the project’s total cost.

Since 1997, NFL teams have constructed 20 new stadiums, receiving an average of $238 million per stadium in public funding and costing a total of $4.76 billion. The advisory firm Conventions, Sports, and Leisure compiled the cost of each of the 20 stadiums and the amount of public funds each stadium received.

Some teams were taxpayer heroes: MetLife Stadium, which the New York Giants and New York Jets share, didn’t cost taxpayers a penny—the two teams footed the $1.6 billion bill. Other teams, like the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Baltimore Ravens, and Cincinnati Bengals heavily relied on public funding for their new stadiums. The Buccaneers’ $194-million Raymond James Stadium was entirely funded by public money.

Last season, the NFL’s teams split a record $7.24 billion from the league’s revenue-sharing agreement, with each team receiving $226 million. This amount doesn’t include other revenues from things like ticket sales, including luxury suites and club tickets.

Subsidies for sports stadiums are only one example of the favoritism bestowed on business owners with the right government connections. The Charles Koch Institute has tracked cronyism and corporate welfare and the harmful effects they have on competition. The Charles Koch Foundation also supports new research into cronyism and how favoritism for the well-connected harms the U.S. economy as well as the well-being of Americans, consumers and yes, football fans.

More Blog Posts

06-11-2018 03:06pm

North Korea—Rational Actor, or Unbalanced Risk-Taker?

Could history made in the spring continue through the summer? After tense missile tests and discussions of “bloody nose” strikes, the Korean peninsula has been experiencing a period of unprecedented diplomacy.

Read more

06-11-2018 09:06am

Survey on North Korea: Americans, South Koreans Want Diplomacy Rather Than Military Engagement

In a new survey by the Charles Koch Institute and Real Clear Politics, Americans and South Koreans overwhelmingly agreed that they do not want to pursue military action against North Korea, whether or not the June 12 summit is successful in securing denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

Read more

05-17-2018 11:05am

An Untapped Talent Pool: SHRM and the Charles Koch Institute’s Survey on Employing Individuals With Criminal Records

To learn more about what drives hiring decisions involving people with a criminal record, the Charles Koch Institute and the Society for Human Resource Management have conducted a groundbreaking survey of employers and the American workforce.

Read more

Sign up for updates

Sign up to receive weekly updates in news and events.