Rejecting New Technology: A Centuries-Old Tradition

According to Innovation and Its Enemies: Why People Resist New Technologies by Harvard University professor Calestous Juma, there are eight major reasons why society rejects new technologies—even technologies like coffee and refrigeration. Writing for The Washington Post, Steven Overly explores these eight reasons, among which there are several important lessons for regulators and innovators.

For Juma, resistance to new technologies comes from, among other factors, those with competing commercial interests, those who identify with existing products, those who fear changes to their way of life, and those who might lose power as a result of change.

Additionally, because innovation is often exponential and not linear, governments often fail to appreciate rapid technological advancements and therefore fail to regulate them appropriately. Overly references Uber as an example of government failing to adequately prepare for the rapid expansion and demand for ride-hailing services.

Juma’s observations, as Overly summarizes them, serve as a potent reminder of technology’s rapid transformative power on individual lives. Regulators, unable to properly prepare for future, must increasingly embrace a perspective of permissionless innovation that allows consumers to adopt or reject technology at their own pace.

More Blog Posts

05-20-2020 01:20pm

StoryCorps Connect During COVID-19: Finding a New Way to Share America’s Stories

StoryCorps pivots to digital to keep building connections between people during the pandemic.

Read more

05-19-2020 05:39pm

Free speech provides comfort during COVID-19 pandemic

Trying circumstances can also present opportunities for people to come together. When people feel as if they face a common challenge, differences and divisions begin to blur. That’s cause for optimism.

Read more

05-14-2020 11:20am

Five steps for public officials to protect public health, regain public trust, and ensure civil liberties during COVID-19 crisis

Americans and their public officials grapple with the dynamic while working to protect public health and maintain the public confidence necessary for successful adoptions of temporary measures and ultimately restoration of their full civil liberties. Charles Koch Institute Senior Fellow Casey Mattox offers advice on the subject.

Read more

Sign up for updates