Striking the Balance: Sentencing and Public Safety in America

This panel highlighted the need to reform criminal sentencing laws. Arizona State University law professor Erik Luna began by discussing the history of mandatory minimum sentences in the United States, noting how major sentencing reforms begun in the 1970s and ’80s were based on a belief that disparities in sentencing were incredibly wide. This animating principle was overstated, though, according to Luna. He argued that the changes had the perverse effect of politicizing the process further, by transferring discretion regarding sentencing into the hands of prosecutors, who choose the particular crimes with which an individual will be charged.

Open Society Foundations senior policy analyst Nkechi Taifa noted how bipartisan coalitions on criminal justice policy have historically been quite destructive to our society, but mentioned the powerful potential for significant improvements to our legal system. She also noted how individuals can change over time, and how incarcerating individuals for upwards of 20 years may actually not have the intended impact on public safety.

Julie Stewart, president of Families Against Mandatory Minimums, began her remarks by explaining the human impact of mandatory minimum sentences. Further, she said, mandatory minimums are not achieving their intended result. She spoke to a range of attempted reforms and, importantly, described a few successful ones that have actually brought needed change to our sentencing laws.

Stephen Walker, director of governmental affairs for the California Correctional Peace Officers Association, noted how a “tough on crime” approach was not only increasingly being recognized as ineffective policy, it also worsened the working environment for law enforcement authorities. He spoke to how his office was out in front on the overcrowding issues in California prisons, and he acknowledged the significant need for reform to numerous aspects of our criminal justice system.

Charles Koch Institute external relations senior manager Ewan Watt moderated the panel and closed the conversation by noting how the panel had identified progress that has been made toward reforming mandatory minimum sentences as well as barriers to reform. To learn more about how you can get involved, please visit the Charles Koch Foundation’s Request for Proposals page.

More Blog Posts

05-20-2020 01:20pm

StoryCorps Connect During COVID-19: Finding a New Way to Share America’s Stories

StoryCorps pivots to digital to keep building connections between people during the pandemic.

Read more

05-19-2020 05:39pm

Free speech provides comfort during COVID-19 pandemic

Trying circumstances can also present opportunities for people to come together. When people feel as if they face a common challenge, differences and divisions begin to blur. That’s cause for optimism.

Read more

05-14-2020 11:20am

Five steps for public officials to protect public health, regain public trust, and ensure civil liberties during COVID-19 crisis

Americans and their public officials grapple with the dynamic while working to protect public health and maintain the public confidence necessary for successful adoptions of temporary measures and ultimately restoration of their full civil liberties. Charles Koch Institute Senior Fellow Casey Mattox offers advice on the subject.

Read more

Sign up for updates