Foreign Policy Research Grants | Navigating U.S.-Russia Relations

Foreign Policy Research Grants | Navigating U.S.-Russia Relations

If peaceful and more cooperative relations are to be restored between the two countries, a significant change in the status quo is required.

The United States’ increased tensions with the Russian Federation have created a climate of mistrust and renewed military competition. The United States has been increasing military deployments to Europe, developing new conventional and nuclear weapons, and wielding economic sanctions in response to Russia’s invasion of Crimea in 2014. Recent strain over Russia’s more aggressive actions such as meddling in the 2016 elections, the violation of arms treaties, and Russian assassination campaigns both in and outside its own sovereign territory have only deepened the competitive spiral between the two nations. At the same time, the United States and Russia share interests in preventing terrorism in the Middle East, addressing nonproliferation and nuclear arms control, promoting stability in Eurasia, and hedging against a rising China. Importantly, Russia has a small economy — roughly the size of South Korea — and spends a small fraction of what the U.S. spends on its military. If peaceful and more cooperative relations are to be restored between the two countries, a significant change in the status quo is required. As such, the Charles Koch Institute is soliciting proposals which:

  • Examine ways the United States and Russia can ease tensions and avoid unnecessary conflict, including examining the right balance of diplomatic and economic engagement with military deterrence.
  • Research the future of arms control, particularly New Start, and explore other ways to moderate conventional and nuclear arms racing.
  • Examine the costs and benefits of NATO membership for states on NATO’s periphery such as Ukraine and Georgia, and explore alternatives to NATO enlargement in Eastern Europe.
  • Examine the relative power and threat of the Russian military to the interests of the United States.
  • Examine Russia’s role in the Middle East, especially ways to deconflict U.S. and Russian forces in the region and cooperate on issues of shared interest.
  • Examine options for structuring U.S./NATO military forces that limit the risk of confrontation or escalation with Russia.
  • Explore the implications of improved U.S.-Russian relations for European alliances and/or institutions.
  • Examine ways for Russia and the United States to cooperate on transnational security challenges, particularly nuclear nonproliferation and terrorism.
  • Explore Russia’s role in stabilizing Afghanistan and issues of common interest with the United States.

 


Grant Criteria

  • A one-to-two-page abstract of the project on behalf of your think tank or other 501(c)(3) organization. The abstract should provide sufficient detail for reviewers to assess the nature and feasibility of the idea.*
  • A brief, itemized budget.*
  • Final projects should be original, meet the highest standards, and must not have been previously published.

*Items are required in application.


Funding

Funding levels are commensurate with the requirements of the research and the potential for the research to advance an understanding of critical issues. Accepted proposals may also receive support to disseminate the research findings.


Review & Notification Process

Proposals will be accepted and evaluated on a rolling basis.

Foreign Policy Research

We are proud to support research that challenges status quo thinking and inspires fresh perspectives in the foreign policy debate.

Foreign Policy

We support new voices and sound scholarship that speak to America's enduring interests and policies that will make our country safer.

Learn More

Executive-Legislative Relations and War Powers

As the underlying legal authorities for American activities in Yemen, Syria, and elsewhere attract increasing scrutiny, policymakers must appreciate the need for appropriate oversight and accountability over the power to commence, fund, and finish hostilities.

Learn More

The Future of America's Alliances

Given problems with burden-sharing and conflicting interests, U.S. policymakers should reevaluate the costs and benefits of the U.S.’s security commitments.

Learn More

Ending Endless Wars in the Middle East

As political will mounts to leave foreign conflicts and bring American troops home, policymakers must grapple with exit strategies and the lessons learned from the last few decades of engagement.

Learn More

Managing Relations with China

As Washington, DC gears up for an era of “Great Power Competition” with China, academics and policymakers should ask whether the underlying assumption that these two states are destined for conflict is true.

Learn More

Trade

The Charles Koch Institute seeks to partner with scholars and organizations interested in understanding issues related to trade policy, including the social and economic benefits of free trade, as well as defining and addressing true national-security threats and illiberal trade practices.

Learn More